Skip to main content

"I really don't know love at all"



This is article– or possible series of articles – is the result of months of Guantanamo-style interrogations to friends and acquaintances who are or have been in a relationship (or the millennial equivalent of a relationship - whatever that is). That’s where I know most of this stuff from - I get the rest from Joni Mitchell songs and random Caribbean poets.

These dialogues triggered a series of reflections on love, longing, loss and all that mushy mumbo jumbo. I observe and listen and ask questions. In particular, there is a question that no one has been able to answer - one that I often don’t have the courage to ask.

How fucking mental do you have to be let yourself fall for someone?

Unless you intend to hurt yourself… would you jump off a plane without a parachute? Would you French kiss someone with Ebola? Would you put your hand on an open flame?

The cue is in the word. Fall.

The whole concept of falling automatically implies an impact, a commotion - something that may easily break you. Why would you expose yourself to that kind of danger? Why would you wilfully let yourself fall?  

I know that this argument borders on stale clichés that cause uncontrollable eye-rolling in most people including me (better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all, yada yada) but the situation is, well, a lot more nuanced than that. And for the record, I am also vaguely familiar with the ways in which real love is really worth the risk. But I don’t want to talk about that now. Before you get there, you have to let yourself get past the point of being afraid to fall and crash and burn. And that’s what I want to focus on now.

People have been trying to figure this stuff out for centuries – scientists, doctors, chiropractors -with very little success. Even Joni Mitchell, universally accepted as the one and only priestess of love, admitted it: “I really don’t know love at all.” But there’s no science or method in my reasoning. It’s a mix of instinct and assumption - with a touch of anecdotal evidence. It’s not universal – but I trust that some of you might see something of yourself in my words.

My speculative and factually worthless theory is therefore very simple. Before we fall in love, we’re either in a good place, stable and content with ourselves, or in a bad place, lonely and possibly broken, waiting for someone to come along and rescue us. Whatever category you belong to… love is a Russian roulette. Whether you’re happy or sad, the gun’s not going to care and – quite literally - you’ll never know what hit you.

If you’re a happy individual, falling in love might mercilessly strip you of that happiness. If you’re miserable, it might magnify the pain and serve you the final blow. This doesn’t seem to stop us, though. We blindly jump into the ring of fire – indifferent to the cost of our actions.

Are we to blame for this?  Is love a choice or an accident that just happens to us? It might be a fortuitous event but we must claim at least some responsibility for it. Einstein said it first: “You can’t blame gravity for falling in love.”

On some level, we do make a conscious choice to abandon ourselves to a state of vulnerability that in any other scenario would be strongly discouraged for its recklessness.

We give up some of our independence to instil an inescapable need that we can’t satisfy – and we’ll be at the mercy of another person who, with the snap of a finger, will determine whether we’re going to have a good day or a miserable fucking week. We end up hurting ourselves in the attempt to meet this primal need to be loved, to feel whole.


I don’t want to be dramatic – but this specific topic calls for it. I have a strong sense of self and I often think that I’ve been through too much shit to jeopardise my inner peace. For a long time, I was starved of it and that’s why, when it comes to happiness, I just won’t tolerate any waste. 
And if you’re one of those overly-sentient beings that feel too much too often then you’ll know what I’m talking about. This is why I’m frightened, pretty much all the time, at the thought of falling. Love is great, it really is– but there’s so much to lose.

Despite all of this – or maybe because of it - love was and still is one of the most fascinating human experiences to me. Of all the weird shit people are into – love is the one that never ceases to amaze me for its weirdness – and its greatness. I’m scared shitless of it – I won’t lie to you. But if I stand by my motto - borrowed from my hero Nora Ephron - that “Everything Is Copy” then I must be stay open to it, because in life as in writing, it really doesn’t get better than love… and its side effects, whether that’s plain heartbreak or atrocious, scorching, life-sucking heartburn.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Valerio's Press Review: "GQ Magazine, April 2021"

Welcome to Valerio's Press Review, the series in which I read a magazine or newspaper (okay... look at the pictures) and write mean things about the people in them. It's fun! 1) A revitalising afternoon of clam-digging on Southend beach? A day of snorkelling by the port of Dover? Make sure you pack Rolex’s newest submarine watch! You don’t want the fish to think you’re poor.  2) Dolce & Gabbana’s latest collection. The question on everybody’s lips is: do you really want to look like your rich friend’s beach house bathroom? The answer is, and always will be, yes. 3) Sam Claflin for Barbour. A GQ insider told me that his puzzled expression is due to the fact that, for the whole duration of the photo shoot, Sam couldn’t help but wonder if he’d remembered to feed the cat before he left his flat. Models... they’re just like us <3 4) GQ’s Staycation must-have items. If you were stranded on a desert island and you could only bring one item with you, what would it be? Duh! A £32

The Love Series: Dressed For The Occasion

I think we’ve all been there before. You’ve finally managed to bag a hot date. You approach the whole operation with scientific precision and military discipline. You pick the best time for both of you, scour Yelp for the cheapest restaurants with a minimum hygiene rating of 4/5 and proceed to send your location to the group chat so your friends know where to find your lifeless body in case your date turns out to be the millennial Ted Bundy/Aileen Wuornos. Everything is ready, planned to the last detail. But then the big day comes and, oh shit… you have nothing to wear. You lean into your closet and ouch, all you can see is a blurry cluster of old, faded, Salvation Army-ish items that all of your friends will promptly veto and report to the authorities (wearing them in public would indeed qualify as a lewd act) the moment they receive your panicked snaps. It’s like Primark’s reduced section on steroids. A felt jacket? Too shabby. A funky silk shirt with oriental patterns? too

Fifty shades of public transport: a journey to hell

This was meant to happen, sooner or later. I bet you all saw this coming. I mean, everyone who knows me has heard me complaining about any form of public transport at least once. And after spending one year in the busiest city in the world, where the tube is basically a national institution just like the Queen and cucumbers in sandwiches, I am ready to speak out. Even though I promised myself that I wasn't going to merely look through all the legendary stereotypes about public means of transport, the circumstances force me to mention at least some of them, clearly enriched with the inedited shades of absurdity that have been coloring my life since its very beginning. I'd start by describing you one of the most uncomfortable situation that my daily life offers me. No, wait, I'll reword this.  I am not talking of one particular episode. I mean, that's it: my life is an uncomfortable situation. But let's start from the beginning. I wake u